Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brian Graff's avatar

Come on Mike - nobody knows what the future level of immigration will be... and "less than one percent" does not mean "exactly one percent".

Carney is promising to bring NPRs to under 5%, but again, that does not mean it will remain at exactly 5% forever. It was under 1% if we go back a few years, because NPRs left in roughly equal numbers to we let in - mostly seasonal workers.

In fact, the 1% number comes from a fiction that many pro-immigration promote - that it is an average of past immigration and is therefore reasonable. But it was only the average if you use 1900-1990, which includes the high growth 1900-1914 era when we filled up the Prairies.

AND Carney is promising to double the 250,000 homes we build now to 500,000. Even the 250,000 we build now implies more than 1% net growth - and you seem to ignore emigration here. 500,000 homes would mean population growth of well over 1 million a year. Not going to happen.

Aaron Maenpaa's avatar

Furthermore, even with a completely static or declining population, as Canadians get richer they will want and be able to afford more and better space. We need to build more (and tear down more old structures) so that we aren't stuck with houses that are too small and have antiquated insulation, windows, heating/cooling, etc and are full of asbestos.

No posts

Ready for more?